Tregelles, lists extended excerpts from An Account of the Printed Text of the Greek New Testament London, 1854 , F In this case a deference to the most ancient authorities, as well as a consideration of internal evidence, might seem to involve immediate loss
Scrivener, A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament 4th edition , in defense of the pericope de adultera by Edward F

Ellicott, The Revision of the English Version of the NT, intro.

ما صحة حديث ( بشر الزاني بالفقر ) ؟
Site dedicated to proving that the passage is authentic, with links to a wide range of scholarly published material on both sides about all aspects of this text, and dozens of new articles
ميراث إبن الزنا
, list marginal notes from several versions, extended discussion taken from Samuel P
ميراث إبن الزنا
Of these, the pericope of the woman taken in adultery holds the first place of importance
Hughes, "The Lukan Special Material and the Tradition History of the Pericope Adulterae," Novum Testamentum 55 — allows two or more New Testament manuscript editions' readings of the passage to be compared in side-by-side and unified views similar to output• Jerusalem Bible, reference at John 7:53• , The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, New York: , 2005
Holmes in The Apostolic Fathers in English Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006 , p The Early Church Fathers Volume 7 by Philip Schaff public domain pp

The best solution may be to place the passage in brackets, for the purpose of showing, not, indeed, that it contains an untrue narrative for, whencesoever it comes, it seems to bear on its face the highest credentials of authentic history , but that evidence external and internal is against its being regarded as an integral portion of the original Gospel of St.

عقاب الزنا في الدنيا والآخرة
Brown, The Gospel According to John i—xii , in the Anchor Bible series Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1966
(7) نكاح المحلل
ما حكم الزاني المتزوج
, a detailed study by Wieland Willker
'Pericope adulterae', in FL Cross ed This phrase terra terram accusat is also given in the Gospel Book of Hitda of Maschede and a ninth-century glossa, Codex Sangelensis 292, and a sermon by attributes the use of these words to Ambrose and Augustine, and other phrases to the Glossa Ordinaria and John Chrysostom, who is usually considered as not referencing the Pericope
Ehrman in Misquoting Jesus, HarperCollins Hills, taken from chapter 6 of his book, The King James Version Defended, 4th edition Des Moines: Christian Research Press, 1984

NY, 1873 Online at CCEL Christian Classic Ethereal Library• London, 1894 , Bruce Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament Stuttgart, 1971 , Raymond E.

الزانية في الإنجيل
"The passages which touch Christian sentiment, or history, or morals, and which are affected by textual differences, though less rare than the former, are still very few
الزَّانِي لا يَنْكِحُ إلا زَانِيَةً
تفسير قوله تعالى ( الزاني لا ينكح إلا زانية أو مشركة )